Lemlist vs Woodpecker: Which Is the Best Cold Email Tool in 2024?

Choosing the right cold email outreach tool can really make or break your sales or marketing efforts, don’t you think?

Well, if you’ve been exploring different options, you’ve probably come across Lemlist and Woodpecker.

These two tools are pretty popular for cold emailing, but how do you know which one is the best fit for you?

Well, that’s what our blog is for!

In this blog, we’re going to dive into an honest and detailed comparison, so you can make the best decision for your needs.

We also have a surprise contender for both tools, which offers more features at an affordable price.

Let’s see how Lemlist and Woodpecker match up against each other without any delays!

Lemlist Vs. Woodpecker: Table of Content

• To the Point TL;DR
• Lemlist Vs. Woodpecker: A Quick Comparison Table
• Lemlist Vs. Woodpecker: In-Depth Comparison
• Our Verdict – Which Is the Right Cold Email Tool for Your Needs?
• Lemlist vs. Woodpecker FAQs

To the Point TL;DR

Our blog is quite detailed and runs a bit long, so we thought we would share our findings with our readers in a hurry.

Here’s what we found after trying both the tools for a few days:

• Woodpecker is a more cost-effective and scalable cold email tool than Lemlist.
• Lemlist offers multichannel outreach and advanced personalization capabilities than Woodpecker.
• The alternative to both, Saleshandy, offers more features at a highly affordable price.
  “Saleshandy—$1,788 annually (250K emails per month), Woodpecker—$3,912 annually (48K emails per month), and Lemlist—$46,440 annually.”

Interested to know more about all the tools. Read without skipping!

Lemlist Vs. Woodpecker: A Quick Comparison Table

Lemlist Vs. Woodpecker: In-Depth Comparison

We have taken a different approach than usual.

Most blogs focus on comparing the key features of the tools, but we went a step further to provide you with more value.

We have compared Woodpecker and Lemlist based on what matters most – how effectively they perform in critical areas of cold emailing.

These are the aspects we have used to do the side-by-side comparison:

1. Prospecting (Lead Database)
2. Cold Email Sequence Automation
3. Email Deliverability (Protecting email and domain reputation)
4. Personalization Capability
5. Centralized Inbox Management
6. Scalability of Campaigns
7. Agency Compatibility (For lead generation agencies offering cold emailing service)
8. Integrations
9. Pricing Breakdown

We will mention the winner in each of the above aspects. This will give you a better picture of which tool excels where.

Let’s jump in and start comparing!

1. Prospecting (Lead Database)

A lead database in your cold emailing tool will help you save a lot of time, effort, and money. 

You don’t have to pay for a separate tool or waste time switching between two tools.

Lemlist and Woodpecker can help you find the right prospects for your business.

Let’s see how!

What Lemlist has to offer?

With Lemlist, you get a B2B lead database with over 450M+ contacts (email addresses and phone numbers).

You can use the various filters Lemlist has to pinpoint prospects matching your ICP and buyer persona.

The filters are divided into 4 sections:

1. General
2. Signals & Intent
3. Company Information
4. Contact Information

What Does Woodpecker have to offer?

Woodpecker does not have an inbuilt B2B lead database like Lemlist.

Instead, you can integrate with tools like Hunter.io, UpLead, etc., to find prospects and easily push them into Woodpecker.

Which Tool is Better For Prospecting – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

Well, the answer should be pretty obvious in this case—Lemlist is the better prospecting tool.

Although Woodpecker offers native integrations, you still have to pay to use a separate tool. So, we crowned Lemlist based on its superior value.

Next, let’s look at how effective the tools are at helping you automate your cold email sequences.

2. Cold Email Sequence Automation

A good cold email automation tool should help you create complex sequences and be easy to learn and master.

Let’s learn about Woodpecker’s and Lemlist’s sequence-building and automation capabilities.

What does Lemlist have to offer?

You can easily create multichannel sequences in Lemlist.

The UI is in a flow-chat form, making it user-friendly and allowing you to create complex sequences quickly.

There are 3 ways you can create sequences:

1. By using AI.
2. Manually by selecting steps.
3. Or by duplicating an existing sequence in another campaign.

Lemlist also has various steps you can use in the sequence. These steps are categorized into two:

1. Automatic steps
2. Manual steps

Automatic steps are executed by Lemlist, whereas the manual steps have to be done by you.

Here is a list of all the various steps available in Lemlist:

1. Email (Automatic)
2. LinkedIn – Send a chat message (Automatic)
3. LinkedIn – Send a voice message (Automatic)
4. LinkedIn – Send an invitation (Automatic)
5. LinkedIn – Visit profile (Automatic)
6. Call (Manual)
7. Manual task (Manual)
8. Call an API
9. Send to another campaign

In addition to steps, you also have various conditions that you can use to create multiple decision branches in your sequences.

The conditions are split into two – based on lead information and lead actions. These are the various conditions in Lemlist:

1. Has email address
2. Has LinkedIn URL
3. Has phone number
4. Custom condition
5. Opened email
6. Clicked on the link in the email
7. Unsubscribe from email
8. Booked a meeting (in lemcal)
9. Accepted LinkedIn invitation

Note: The first four are lead information conditions, while the rest are lead action conditions.

Lemlist also has A/B testing functionality. You can A/B test your emails and even test your entire sequence.

Yes, you can create a second version of your entire sequence in Lemlist. This is a first for us as well!

Now that Lemlist has set relatively high standards let’s see what Woodpecker has in store.

What Woodpecker has to offer?

In Woodpecker, you can easily create a path-type cold email sequence with automated emails and manual tasks.

There are two ways to create your cold email sequences: Manually, from scratch, or by copying (duplicating) an existing one.

Coming to the sequence itself, you can have one condition in your sequence to create a branch.

Just one, and depending on where you want your condition, the options available to you will change.

These are the places where you can have a condition-based branch:

1. At the very start, before the first email.
2. After an email.
3. After a task.

It’s much easier to show you the various conditions Woodpecker has.

Conditions at the very start:

Conditions after an Email.

Conditions after a Task.

Within your sequence, you can schedule individual emails to be sent at different times. This is a first!

So, you can have the schedule for your first email to be sent from Monday to Friday between 10 AM to 5 PM and your second email sent from Monday to Friday between 9 AM to 4 PM.

Apart from this, you can also create 5 variations of your email to A/B test them.

For your multichannel needs (LinkedIn and text messages), Woodpecker has ready-made Zaps with LinkedIn, Dux-Soup, and Salesmsg.

That covers what Woodpecker offers in the cold email sequence aspect. Let’s see who the winner of this category is next!

Which Tool is Better at Creating and Automating Cold Email Sequences– Lemlist or Woodpecker?

Based on our hands-on experience with both tools, we have reached a neutral, use–case–based conclusion.

If you need a tool that

• It helps you automate both cold emails and LinkedIn outreach.
• And offers advanced conditions for creating decision branches.

Lemlist is the one for you.

However, if you need an alternative to help you automate cold emails with minimal conditions at a more cost-efficient price, go for Woodpecker!

That said a more cost-effective solution that offers an intuitive way to create and automate cold emails without all these complexities – Saleshandy.

You can experience it firsthand by signing up for a free trial, which will show you how simple it is to create your cold email sequences.

3. Email Deliverability (Protecting email and domain reputation)

Email deliverability plays a considerable role in cold emailing. It is directly responsible for your emails landing in your prospects’ inboxes.

One of the must-have deliverability features that you should look for is Email Warmup.

This will help your new email accounts build the sender reputation they need to start sending cold emails without landing in the spam folder.

Let’s look at what Woodpecker and Lemlist have in improving your email deliverability.

What Lemlist has to offer?

Lemlist offers its own email warmup tool, lemwarm. Although it is a separate platform, it can be accessed directly from Lemlist.

Lemwarm has an email network with over 20,000 health domains, which will help maintain your email deliverability even while running cold email campaigns.

But there’s a catch!

You get lemwarm for free only with Lemlist’s Email Pro plan and not with the base plan.

What Woodpecker has to offer?

Woodpecker has partnered with Mailivery (an email warmup tool) to help warm up your email accounts.

With Woodpecker, you get email warmup from their base plan, which allows you to warm up 2 email accounts for free.

The higher the plan, the more email accounts you get to warm up for free.

If you want to warm up more email accounts, Woodpecker will charge you a small fee of $5 per month per email account.

Now, let’s look at the winner.

Which Tool is Better at Email Deliverability – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

Both Lemlist and Woodpecker help in improving your email deliverability.

However, Lemlist’s starting plan does not include an email warmup. For this reason, Woodpecker is the winner in the email deliverability category.

But what if there’s a better deal out there?

Unlimited Email Accounts for warmup right from the base plan!!

That’s what you get with Saleshandy. There are no restrictions on having email accounts to warm up.

4. Personalization Capability

Generic emails won’t get you anything; they may get you reported and flagged as spam!

But you don’t want that!

You need more positive interactions that lead to sales and increased revenue for your business.

Personalization can help you achieve that easily.

Let’s examine the various personalization features available in Woodpecker and Lemlist.

What Lemlist has to offer?

In Lemlist, you have a variety of personalization features to make your cold emails feel specifically tailored to your prospects.

Here are the features you get:

1. Custom Variables
2. Liquid Syntax
3. Custom Landing Pages
4. Custom Images

With custom variables, you can insert information about your prospects, such as their first name, last name, company name, etc.

Liquid syntax allows you to use conditions to personalize your emails.

Here is an example of a liquid syntax looks: {% assign ampm = “now” | date: “%P” %}{% if ampm contains “am” %}Good morning{% else %}Good afternoon{% endif %}

This sends “Good morning”/”Good afternoon” based on the time your cold email reaches your prospects’ inbox.

You can create custom landing pages with calendar links, other assets, or calls to action.

You can even have a personalized video that appeals to your segmented audience.

These are all that Lemlist has to offer. Next up, Woodpecker!

What Woodpecker has to offer?

Woodpecker offers you two types of personalization – text and video.

You can use Snippets in Woodpecker to personalize your cold emails. Snippets pull information from prospects, such as their first name, company, website, and so on.

If you want to include personalized videos in your cold email, Woodpecker offers an AI video add-on that you can purchase.

All you need is a template video, and Woodpecker will customize it for each prospect with their name using AI technology.

This Add-on will cost you an additional $29 per month.

Now, let’s look at which tool is right for you!

Which Tool is Better At Personalization – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

It’s quite clear that Lemlist beats Woodpecker in terms of personalization capability.

It provides text, image, and landing page personalization at various pricing points.

On the other hand, Woodpecker only has text and video personalization (add-on).

5. Centralized Inbox Management

If you use multiple email addresses to send cold emails, it will be handy to have a place to view and manage replies in a single location.

This is where a centralized inbox comes in.

With a central inbox, you can view all emails in a single location, which will help you save a lot of time and effort.

Let’s look at how these features work in each tool.

What Lemlist has to offer?

Lemlist is out of the race, as it does not have a centralized inbox.

When your prospect replies to your cold email, a task will be created under the “Tasks” tab.

If a prospect sends 2 replies, back-to-back, only the first reply is registered, and a task is created.

This is quite a drawback and can lead to miscommunications and lost opportunities.

Next, let’s see how Woodpecker performs.

What Woodpecker has to offer?

Woodpecker has a centralized inbox management feature.

All emails sent to your email accounts can be seen on the platform, so you won’t have to visit your email inbox again!

Moreover, prospects’ replies get automatically categorized based on their replies as “Interested,” “Maybe Later,” and “Not Interested.”

This will help you save a lot of time that you would have otherwise spent manually sorting through replies.

By now, you should be pretty clear who the winner is, but we have a surprise for you. So, on to the next section!

Which Tool is Better For Prospecting – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

Woodpecker is the clear winner, as Lemlist does not have a centralized reply management feature.

But there’s a catch!

When we used Woodpecker, we found that apart from prospect replies, warmup emails are also shown in the inbox.

This will clutter the inbox and make it hard for you to find your prospects’ replies.

If you want a cleaner inbox with only your prospects’ emails, you should take a look at Saleshandy’s unified inbox.

It’s much more intuitive to use compared to Woodpecker and Lemlist. You can use the filter option to view responses based on sequence, email account used, outcomes and clients associated (for agencies).

It can save a lot of time and increase your productivity by helping you focus on prospects with a high potential to convert into paying customers.

Next, let’s look at the scalability of the tools.

6. Scalability of Campaigns

If you have got the hang of reaching out to prospects and converting them to leads, the next obvious step is to scale your campaigns.

This way, you can generate more leads and sales for your business!

For this to happen, your cold email automation tool should support you in a cost-effective manner.

So, let’s look at how cost-effectively you can scale with Lemlist and Woodpecker.

What Lemlist has to offer?

With Lemlist, you have no restrictions on the number of emails you can send.

However, Lemlist’s pricing is based on the number of email accounts you can connect at a time, which can become quite expensive when you want to scale your campaigns.

Let us explain.

To scale your cold email outreach safely without getting flagged as spam or getting blacklisted, you have to connect multiple email accounts to your cold email tool.

This way, you can safely bypass the 50 emails per day per email account threshold.

For more information, read: How Many Cold Emails to Send per Day to Avoid Landing in Spam?

As Lemlist has set limits on the number of email accounts you can connect, you must subscribe to a higher plan to scale your outreach without compromising email deliverability.

This will increase costs and make it less economical to scale your outreach.

Next, let us see if Woodpecker can be a better scalable solution!

What Woodpecker has to offer?

Woodpecker allows you to connect unlimited email accounts – FOR FREE!

But that doesn’t mean you can reach out to an unlimited number of prospects.

Woodpecker has 2 ways to limit you:

• You can reach out to a certain number of prospects within a month.
• Or, you can send only a certain number of emails in a month.

This is how it works.

With Woodpecker’s base plan at $20 per month, you can either contact 500 prospects or send 6,000 emails monthly. 

Let’s say one of your campaigns has 5 steps (1 initial email and 4 follow-up emails) and has 500 prospects in it.

Once the campaign has run its course, you will have contacted 500 prospects and sent a total of 2,500 emails (500 prospects X 5 emails).

Although you can send more emails, since you hit the 500 prospect cap a month, you will not be able to send any more emails.

So, to make the most of your investment, you have to plan your outreach carefully to get maximum ROI within the set restrictions.

Now that you have learned about the scalability of both tools let’s see who the winner is, although it is quite obvious.

Which Tool is Better For Prospecting – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

Woodpecker is the winner.

Let’s work out some numbers, shall we?

Lemlist’s highest plan allows you to connect 15 emails for $129 per month (annual billing).

That means you can safely send 750 emails daily (15 email accounts X 50 email per day limit).

That’s 15,000 emails monthly (750 emails a day X 20 working days in a month).

If we divide this number by the average number of steps in a campaign (5), you can reach 3,000 prospects a month.

So, to reach out to 3,000 prospects monthly, you have to spend $1,548 annually ($129 per month X 12).

Reaching out to the same number of prospects in Woodpecker would cost you $56 monthly.

In addition, you have a limit of 36,000 emails per month, which means you can be more flexible and have more steps if needed.

Annually, Woodpecker would cost you $672.

So you would save more than half of what you spent on Lemlist.

But if you look closely, although you reach out to the same number of prospects at half the cost, Woodpecker’s plan leaves you with 15,000 unused emails each month.

These extra emails go to waste because the prospect limit is reached before the email limit.

If only there were a tool that would let us use its capabilities more efficiently.

Enter – Saleshandy! 

In Saleshandy, you can add unlimited email accounts for free, and there are no restrictions on the number of prospects you can reach out to.

This is going to surprise you, so do the math with us!

In Saleshandy’s most popular plan – Outreach Pro which is $74 per month or $888 annually, you can send 125,000 emails per month.

Going by the same numbers, with a limit of 125,000 emails per month, you can reach out to 25,000 prospects!! (125,000 emails per month/5 steps in a campaign)

We’ll let those numbers sink in for a moment.

…

…

If the blog had been titled Lemlist vs. Woodpecker vs. Saleshandy vs. any other in the market, we would have announced Saleshandy as the winner. (That’s just us being Cheesy!!)

Well, on to the next subsection.

7. Agency Compatibility (For Lead Generation Agencies Offering Cold Emailing Services)

This section will deconstruct how Lemlist and Woodpecker are compatible with lead generation agencies.

We’ll help you find which tool best suits the needs of an agency environment. 

What Lemlist has to offer?

With Lemlist, you need to create separate teams (workspaces) to manage your clients.

For each team you create, you have to pay the subscription fee, and you are also charged for each seat (team member) added to the workspace.

So, let’s revisit Lemlist’s pricing again to get a clearer picture of the costs.

The Outreach Scale plan is $129 per month per user. So, you must pay $129 monthly for every user (team member) you want to invite and help manage the campaigns.

Let’s say your agency has 10 clients, and you have 3 people to manage each client’s campaigns.

Basic math tells us that you will be “SHELLING OUT” $129 X 10 (1 client = 1 team) X 3 (User = team members) = $3870 monthly or $46,440 annually.

That’s expensive!

On the other hand, you’d be surprised to know how affordable Woodpecker is!

What Woodpecker has to offer?

Woodpecker has a separate agency portal for its agency users.

You can manage your and your client’s campaigns on the same platform without hassle or clutter.

You will have to pay a small fee of $27 per month per client to manage them.

This is quite reasonable compared to Lemlist, where you have to repay the entire subscription for a client.

You can also white label Woodpecker to reflect your branding for $5 per month, per client.

Moreover, you can add unlimited team members at no additional cost.

Now, it’s time to work on some numbers!

Lemlist’s Outreach Scale plan = 3,000 prospects contacted with Woodpecker.

So, the subscription fee you will be paying is $56 per month.

For 10 clients and 3 team members, you will pay $56 + $27 (fee) X 10 (clients) = $326 monthly or $3912 yearly.

That’s what you were charged monthly in Lemlist!

This excludes warmups and other add-ons, but even with every possible addition, you would still pay far, far less than what you would have paid in Lemlist.

Again, although it is obvious who the winner is, bear with us a bit cause we have something interesting to show you!

Which Tool is Better For Prospecting – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

$46,440 or $3912 yearly. 

You choose what you want to pay for handling the same number of clients with almost the same parameters.

The definite answer is to pay $3912 yearly – Therefore, we’re announcing Woodpecker as the most agency-compatible tool (between the 2)

But why pay $3,912 annually when you can pay a more affordable price?

With Saleshandy, you can add unlimited clients and invite unlimited team members to manage their campaigns at NO EXTRA CHARGE!

This means you only have to pay the subscription fee for the platform!

Saleshandy’s Outreach scale plan – $149 monthly – $1,788 annually.

• Unlimited email accounts
• Unlimited clients
• Unlimited team members
• Unlimited teams
• White label
• 250,000 emails per month

So, Saleshandy – $1,788 annually, Woodpecker – $3,912 annually (48K emails per month) and Lemlist – $46,440 annually.

The choice again is yours!

8. Integrations

Integrations help you streamline your workflow by transferring data back and forth between the tools in your stack.

This will help you save a lot of time and effort. Let’s look at the various integrations Woodpecker and Lemlist offer.

What Lemlist has to offer?

Lemlist is one of the tools in the market that offers a wide range of integrations.

The native integrations you get are:

• HubSpot
• Salesforce
• Pipedrive
• Aircall

Apart from this, Lemlist has over 25+ integrations. Some of the popular ones are OpenAI, Slack, Zapier, UpLead, etc.

However, the integrations you can access are based on the pricing plan.

Next on the list, Woodpecker!

What Woodpecker has to offer?

Woodpecker also is not a laggard when it comes to offering integrations.

In fact, Woodpecker has 14 native integrations, and the total number of integrations available is 42.

That said, you have to pay a fee of $20 per month to use APIs, webhooks, and integrations.

Which Tool is Better For Prospecting – Lemlist or Woodpecker?

Both tools offer the necessary integrations you would look for in a cold emailing tool.

However, in Lemlist, to get access to the basic CRM integrations, you have to choose their Email Pro plan, which costs $69 per month.

With Woodpecker, you have to pay a flat $20 per month fee to use their API, webhooks, and integrations.

So just by going with the numbers and variety of integrations we’ll have to give this one to Woodpecker.

9. Pricing Breakdown

Pricing plays an important role in deciding which tool is the right choice for your business.

That said, nowadays, you can contact the tool’s respective sales team to get a custom plan or offer just for you.

This flexibility can help you get the tool that your team needs within your budget.

Anyway, let’s break down the pricing of each tool and see which is more cost-effective and would better suit your needs.

Lemlist’s Pricing Plans

Lemlist has a four-tiered pricing plan.

1. Email Starter
2. Email Pro
3. Multichannel Expert
4. Outreach Scale
5. Custom Plan

Email Starter: $32/mo/user/1 sending email

This is the perfect plan for individuals or startups just starting out with cold emailing. 

Features Included in This Plan: 

• Send unlimited campaigns
• Customizable email campaigns
• Email finder + verifier (250 credits/mo)
• 450M+ leads database
• AI-generated sequence
• Custom text variable personalization
• Push leads from LinkedIn into Lemlist with the Lemlist Chrome Extension
• Custom reports & analytics
• In-app support by chat or email
• Personalized booking page lemcal Starter

Email Pro: $55/ mo/user /3 sending email

This plan would be useful if you are a small—to midsize business looking to access more advanced cold email features.

Features Included in This Plan: 

• Everything in Email Starter
• Email finder + verifier (500 credits/mo)
• Lemwarm for free
• CRM integrations (Hubspot, Pipedrive, Salesforce)
• Custom image personalization
• Inbox rotation
• Custom liquid syntax personalization
• API Access & Zapier

As you can see, this plan is actually

Multichannel Expert: $79/mo/user/5 sending email

This is a perfect fit for agencies and businesses that want to reach out to their prospects through multiple channels like emails, LinkedIn, and calls.

Features Included in This Plan: 

• Everything in Email Pro
• Email finder + verifier (750 credits/mo)
• Linkedin prospection
• LinkedIn voice notes
• Campaign A/B
• Cold calling prospecting with Aircall
• Advanced campaign conditions
• Custom landing page
• Premium support chat

Outreach Scale: $129/mo/user/15 sending email

This is a good option for you if you are looking to scale your multichannel outreach campaigns.

Features Included in This Plan: 

• Everything in Multichannel Expert
• Email finder + verifier (1,000 credits/mo)
• Dedicated account manager (4+ seats)

Customized Pricing Plans:

You can get a customized plan if you need more than 10 seats.

Add-on:

Email Finder & Verifier:

If you want to buy extra credits for email finding and verification, you can purchase it as an add-on. It is priced on a scale from 0-5000. For instance, if you choose 2,500 on the scale, you will get:

• 1,250 LinkedIn enrichments (2 credits/lead)
• 2,500 Verify existing emails (1 credit/email)
• 500 Find verified emails (5 credits/email found)

Woodpecker’s Pricing Plans

Woodpecker has 3 pricing plans:

• Cold Email (For individual businesses)
• Agency Plan
• Custom Plan

Woodpecker has a unique pricing plan.

You are changed based on the number of prospects you want to contact, and depending on this, the number of emails you can send per month, prospects you can store, and the number of free warm-up email accounts you get change.

Let’s take a look at the other features you get!

Cold Email: Starts at $20 per month (Contacted prospects – 500)

This is best for sales and marketing teams 

This is what you get:

• Inbox Rotation
• Centralized Inbox
• Deliverability – Email Warmup
• Customizable sending intervals
• Send in the prospect’s timezone
• Spam words and links checker
• Condition-based campaigns
• Organize campaigns in folders
• A/B tests – Up to 5 variants
• ‘Out of office’ inbox auto
• AI email writer
• GDPR compliant
• Live chat and email support

Agency Plan: Priced similarly to Cold Email Plans 

• Everything in cold emailing plan is also included here
• Active clients, each for $27/Month
• All client stats in one panel
• Agency outreach calendar
• Global blacklist for all clients
• Client connects mailboxes without sharing passwords
• View-only access for clients
• Automated audits for client domains
• Centralized billing for all clients
• Email-LinkedIn-call combined sequences
• Manual tasks (Calls, SMS, LinkedIn)
• 1-on-1 onboarding

Custom Plan: Start at Contacted prospects 10K, Emails per month – 160K, Stored prospects – 40K)

• Custom price for active clients
• Custom legal support and agreement
• Dedicated Success Manager
• Onboarding and migration services
• Campaigns and account audits
• Early access to new features
• Longer trial period
• Bundle pricing for Add-ons
• Discounted pricing for large volumes

Our Verdict – Which Is the Right Cold Email Tool for Your Needs?

It’s time to announce the winner and settle the debate between Woodpecker and Lemlist.

We have individually reviewed both Woodpecker and Lemlist. Read on to learn more details about each tool.

Here are our verdicts.

Woodpecker is your choice if you are looking for a cost-effective tool for your business (Lead generation agency or individual business).

On the other hand, if you are willing to pay a hefty sum for multichannel outreach, you can definitely go ahead with Lemlist.

Alternatively, it would help if you considered Saleshandy.

Here’s what it brings to your table:

• Unlimited email accounts (no extra charge)
• Unlimited team members (no extra charge)
• Unlimited email accounts for warmup (no extra charge)
• High sending volume
• Deliverability features – Sender rotation, Sequence score, and more.
• Unlimited clients (no extra charge)
• White label

If you want to make a decision easily, sign up for a free trial on Saleshandy and you will instantly know which is the right tool for your needs.

Lemlist Vs. Woodpecker FAQs

1. Can Lemlist or Woodpecker scale with my business as it grows?

While Lemlist has advanced features, it is highly expensive, whereas Woodpecker has affordable pricing plans but lacks advanced features. Saleshandy strikes the perfect balance by offering advanced cold emailing features at cost-effective pricing.

2. What kind of customer support can I expect from Lemlist and Woodpecker?

Both Lemlist and Woodpecker offer great customer support. You can reach out to their customer support teams anytime for assistance.

3. Is there a better alternative to Lemlist and Woodpecker?

If you are looking for the best alternative to Lemlist and Woodpecker, consider Saleshandy. It is an all-in-one cold email solution that allows you to connect unlimited email accounts and manage all your clients in a single dashboard at no additional cost.

Moreover, it offers advanced cold emailing features such as B2B database and analytical capabilities to help you close more deals.